U Got It Bad... When Your Risk Scores Are Low

You know that feeling when you're listening to Usher's "U Got It Bad" and the emotion just hits you? That recognition of something being seriously wrong, even when everything looks fine on the surface? That's exactly what's happening in practices across the country when physicians look at their risk adjustment scores and realize they've got it bad – really bad.

Your patients are walking through your doors with complex conditions, multiple comorbidities, and serious health challenges. But somehow, your risk scores are telling a completely different story. They're suggesting your patient population is healthier than you know they actually are. And when risk scores don't reflect reality, you're missing out on the resources, support, and recognition your practice deserves for managing complex care.

If you've been wondering why your value-based care contracts feel financially challenging, why your quality bonuses seem out of reach, or why you're struggling to get adequate support for your sickest patients, low risk scores might be the culprit. And just like Usher's song, once you recognize the problem, you can't ignore it anymore.

The Recognition: When You Realize You Got It Bad

The first sign that you've got it bad with risk scores usually comes during contract negotiations or performance reviews. You're sitting across from your payer representative, looking at reports that suggest your patients are relatively healthy and low-risk. Meanwhile, you're thinking about Mrs. Johnson with her diabetes, heart failure, and chronic kidney disease, or Mr. Rodriguez managing COPD, depression, and hypertension.

There's a disconnect between what you're experiencing in your exam rooms and what the data is showing. Your risk scores are low, but your clinical reality is complex. Your patients require significant time, resources, and expertise to manage their conditions effectively. Yet the financial support you're receiving through risk-adjusted payments doesn't reflect that complexity.

This recognition can be frustrating and confusing. You might start questioning whether you're documenting appropriately, whether your patient population is actually as sick as you think, or whether the whole risk adjustment system is fundamentally flawed. The truth is usually more nuanced – and more fixable – than any of those explanations.

Risk adjustment is designed to ensure that providers caring for sicker patients receive appropriate financial support for that care. When it's working correctly, practices managing complex patient populations get higher risk scores, which translate to higher payments and more resources. When it's not working, practices like yours end up subsidizing the care of complex patients without adequate compensation.

The problem isn't usually that your patients aren't sick enough to generate higher risk scores. The problem is typically that their conditions aren't being captured, documented, or reported in ways that the risk adjustment system can recognize and score appropriately.

The Diagnosis: Understanding Why Your Scores Are Low

Risk adjustment systems are sophisticated, but they're not mind readers. They can only work with the information they receive, and that information comes primarily from your documentation and coding practices. When risk scores are lower than clinical reality suggests they should be, it's usually because of gaps in one or more of these areas.

Documentation gaps are the most common culprit. You might be providing excellent care for complex conditions, but if that complexity isn't clearly documented in your notes, the risk adjustment system has no way to know about it. Many physicians focus their documentation on acute issues and treatment plans while giving less attention to ongoing chronic conditions that significantly impact patient complexity and resource utilization.

Coding accuracy is another critical factor. Even when conditions are well-documented, they need to be coded with appropriate specificity to generate accurate risk scores. Generic codes often carry lower risk weights than specific codes that capture the true severity and complexity of conditions. A code for "diabetes" carries less weight than a code for "diabetes with diabetic nephropathy" or "diabetes with multiple complications."

Timing issues can also impact risk scores significantly. Risk adjustment systems typically work on annual cycles, and conditions need to be documented and coded within specific timeframes to be counted. A patient might have well-established chronic conditions that significantly impact their care needs, but if those conditions aren't addressed and coded during the measurement period, they won't contribute to risk scores.

Care coordination challenges can create additional gaps. When patients receive care from multiple providers, important diagnostic information might be scattered across different systems and documentation platforms. If the primary care provider isn't aware of specialist diagnoses or if those diagnoses aren't being incorporated into ongoing care documentation, risk scores might not reflect the full picture of patient complexity.

The Strategy: Getting Your Risk Scores Right

Once you recognize that you've got it bad with risk scores, the next step is developing a systematic approach to ensure your documentation and coding practices accurately reflect your patient population's complexity. This isn't about gaming the system or inflating scores artificially – it's about making sure the system has access to accurate information about the care you're providing.

Start with a comprehensive review of your highest-risk patients. These are typically patients with multiple chronic conditions, frequent healthcare utilization, or complex care needs. For each of these patients, conduct a thorough chart review to identify all active conditions that impact their care. Look for conditions that might be well-controlled but still require ongoing management, monitoring, or medication adjustments.

Many physicians are surprised to discover how many active conditions they're managing that aren't being consistently documented or coded. A patient might have well-controlled hypertension, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia that require regular monitoring and medication management, but if these conditions aren't mentioned in every relevant encounter, they might not be contributing to risk scores appropriately.

Develop documentation templates and workflows that prompt for chronic condition updates during routine visits. Even when a patient comes in for an acute issue, take a moment to review and document the status of their chronic conditions. This doesn't mean you need to write lengthy assessments for every condition at every visit, but acknowledging their presence and current management status helps ensure they're captured in risk adjustment calculations.

Work closely with your coding team to ensure they understand the clinical significance of the conditions you're documenting. Coders need to understand not just what conditions are present, but how those conditions impact patient care and resource utilization. Regular communication between clinical and coding staff can help identify opportunities for more specific and accurate coding.

Implement systematic processes for capturing and incorporating information from specialists and other healthcare providers. When patients see specialists or have hospitalizations, make sure relevant diagnostic information is incorporated into your ongoing documentation. This might require developing new workflows for reviewing outside records and updating problem lists.

The Team Approach: Why You Can't Do This Alone

Just like Usher often collaborates with other artists to create his best work ("My Boo" with Alicia Keys, "O.M.G." with Will.I.Am, and of course "Yeah!" with Lil Jon and Ludacris), effective risk adjustment requires a team approach. No single person can manage all the documentation, coding, and coordination requirements needed to ensure accurate risk scores. You need a team that understands both the clinical and administrative aspects of risk adjustment.

Your clinical staff need to understand how their documentation impacts risk scores and patient care resources. This doesn't mean they need to become coding experts, but they should understand the importance of comprehensive documentation and the impact of their choices on practice sustainability and patient care quality.

Your coding staff need to understand the clinical context behind the diagnoses they're coding. They should feel comfortable asking questions about clinical scenarios and should be encouraged to seek clarification when documentation could support more specific coding. The goal is accuracy, not just efficiency.

The Technology Factor: Making Systems Work for You

Technology should be your ally in achieving accurate risk scores, but many practices aren't using their systems effectively for this purpose. Electronic health records have powerful features for managing chronic conditions and supporting risk adjustment, but these features often require intentional configuration and use.

Problem list management is fundamental to effective risk adjustment, but many practices don't maintain accurate, up-to-date problem lists. Develop workflows for regularly reviewing and updating problem lists, ensuring that all active conditions are captured and that resolved conditions are appropriately marked. Your problem list should be a living document that reflects your patient's current health status and care needs.

Clinical decision support tools can help prompt for appropriate documentation and coding. Configure your EHR to provide reminders about chronic conditions that need attention, suggest appropriate codes based on documentation, or alert you to potential gaps in risk adjustment capture. These tools work best when they're customized to your practice patterns and patient population.

Reporting capabilities can help you monitor your risk adjustment performance and identify improvement opportunities. Most EHRs can generate reports showing risk scores, chronic condition management, and documentation patterns. Use these reports to identify patients who might have undocumented conditions or to track your progress in improving risk adjustment accuracy.

Integration with other systems can help ensure you have access to complete information about your patients' health status. This might include connections to hospital systems, specialist practices, or health information exchanges. The more complete your information, the more accurately you can document and code your patients' conditions.

The Quality Connection: How Risk Scores Impact Patient Care

It's important to understand that accurate risk adjustment isn't just about financial considerations – it directly impacts your ability to provide high-quality care to your patients. When risk scores accurately reflect patient complexity, you receive appropriate resources to manage that complexity effectively.

Higher risk scores often translate to higher per-member-per-month payments in value-based contracts, which means more resources available for care coordination, chronic disease management, and preventive services. These resources can fund additional staff, extended visit times, or enhanced services that directly benefit patient outcomes.

Accurate risk scores also ensure that quality measures and performance expectations are appropriately adjusted for your patient population's complexity. When you're caring for sicker patients, your quality scores should be evaluated in that context. Risk adjustment helps ensure that practices aren't penalized for caring for complex patient populations.

Care management programs and additional support services are often targeted based on risk scores. Patients with higher risk scores might be eligible for case management, disease management programs, or enhanced care coordination services. When risk scores are artificially low, your patients might miss out on these valuable resources.

The Reality Check: When You Know You've Got It Right

You'll know your risk adjustment practices are working when your risk scores start reflecting the clinical reality you experience every day. Your complex patients will generate appropriate risk scores. Your value-based care contracts will feel more financially sustainable. Your quality performance will be evaluated in appropriate context.

But the real indicator of success is improved patient care. When you have adequate resources to manage complex patients, when you can provide appropriate care coordination and chronic disease management, when your patients have access to the services and support they need – that's when you know your risk adjustment efforts are truly successful.

Your patients deserve providers who understand how to navigate the complex world of risk adjustment to ensure they receive appropriate resources and support. They deserve practices that can sustain high-quality care for complex conditions. And you deserve to be appropriately compensated for the complex, valuable care you provide every day.

So if you've been feeling like you got it bad with risk scores, remember that recognition is the first step toward improvement. With the right strategies, team approach, and ongoing commitment, you can ensure your risk scores accurately reflect your patient population's needs and your practice's value.

Ready to get your risk scores right? Your patients – and your practice sustainability – depend on it.

© 2025 The VBC Whisperer. All rights reserved.