Mean Girls: Why Your Care Team Needs to Sit Together

You know that scene in Mean Girls where Cady gets the brutal rundown of the cafeteria social hierarchy? "You got your freshmen, ROTC guys, preps, J.V. jocks, Asian nerds, cool Asians, varsity jocks, unfriendly black hotties, girls who eat their feelings, girls who don't eat anything, desperate wannabes, burnouts, sexually active band geeks..." The list goes on, each group sitting at their own table, suspicious of the others, operating by unwritten rules that everyone knows but nobody talks about.

Sound familiar? Because that's exactly what's happening in healthcare teams across the country. You've got your physicians sitting at one table, nurses at another, front desk staff huddled together, coding team in the corner, care coordinators off by themselves, and administration floating between groups like they're running for homecoming queen. Everyone's doing their own thing, protecting their territory, and wondering why patient care feels so fragmented and chaotic.

The problem isn't that healthcare professionals are inherently mean – it's that we've created systems that encourage silos, competition, and territorial behavior instead of collaboration and shared success. And just like North Shore High School, these dysfunctional dynamics are sabotaging the very outcomes we're all supposedly working toward.

In value-based care, team collaboration isn't just nice to have – it's absolutely essential for success. When your care team operates like a high school cafeteria full of cliques, patients fall through the cracks, quality measures suffer, and everyone ends up frustrated and burned out. But when you create an environment where everyone sits together, shares common goals, and supports each other's success, magic happens.

The Burn Book: How Healthcare Cliques Sabotage Patient Care

Every dysfunctional healthcare team has its own version of the Burn Book – those unspoken resentments, territorial disputes, and blame games that poison collaboration and make everyone's job harder. Unlike Regina George's literal book of gossip and grievances, healthcare burn books are usually invisible, but they're just as destructive.

The physician clique often sees themselves as the ultimate decision-makers who shouldn't have to explain their choices to "support staff." They make clinical decisions in isolation, change protocols without communication, and then get frustrated when the team doesn't execute their vision perfectly. They complain that nurses don't understand their priorities, that front desk staff can't handle complex scheduling, and that care coordinators don't follow through appropriately.

The nursing clique knows they're the ones who actually make everything work, but they feel undervalued and excluded from important decisions. They develop workarounds for physician preferences they don't understand, create their own communication channels that bypass other team members, and build protective barriers around their workflows. They complain that physicians don't appreciate their expertise, that front desk staff creates problems they have to solve, and that administration doesn't understand the realities of patient care.

The front desk clique controls access to the practice and knows they have more power than anyone wants to admit. They develop their own systems for managing difficult patients, create unofficial policies for handling complex situations, and sometimes use their gatekeeping role to manage interpersonal conflicts. They complain that clinical staff doesn't understand scheduling constraints, that physicians make unrealistic demands, and that everyone expects them to be mind readers.

The coding and administrative clique operates in their own world of regulations, requirements, and deadlines that seem disconnected from patient care. They develop processes that make sense from a compliance perspective but create friction for clinical workflows. They complain that physicians don't document appropriately, that clinical staff doesn't understand administrative requirements, and that everyone treats them like they're not part of the "real" healthcare team.

These cliques aren't inherently evil – they form as natural responses to unclear expectations, poor communication, and competing priorities. But when they become entrenched, they create exactly the kind of toxic environment that makes excellent patient care nearly impossible.

The Plastics Problem: When Leadership Creates Dysfunction

In Mean Girls, the Plastics maintain their power through a combination of exclusivity, manipulation, and fear. They set the rules, decide who's in and who's out, and use their influence to maintain the status quo that keeps them on top. Unfortunately, many healthcare practices have their own version of the Plastics – leadership approaches that create hierarchy, competition, and dysfunction instead of collaboration and shared success.

The "Regina George" leadership style involves making all important decisions unilaterally, communicating through intermediaries rather than directly, and using information as a power tool. These leaders create inner circles of trusted advisors while keeping other team members at arm's length. They set competing priorities for different team members without explaining how those priorities connect to overall goals.

This leadership approach creates exactly the kind of environment where cliques thrive. When team members don't have access to clear information about goals and expectations, they fill in the gaps with assumptions and rumors. When they don't feel valued or included in important decisions, they create their own power structures and communication channels.

The "Gretchen Wieners" leadership style involves trying to please everyone while avoiding difficult conversations and decisions. These leaders want to be liked by everyone, so they avoid setting clear boundaries, making tough choices, or addressing performance issues directly. They hope that being nice will somehow magically create team harmony without having to do the hard work of building functional systems.

This approach is equally destructive because it creates confusion about expectations, allows dysfunction to persist, and ultimately leads to more conflict as team members struggle with unclear roles and responsibilities.

The "Karen Smith" leadership style involves being genuinely well-intentioned but completely oblivious to team dynamics and their impact on patient care. These leaders focus on technical aspects of healthcare delivery while ignoring the interpersonal and system factors that determine whether teams function effectively.

The Cady Transformation: From Outsider to Collaborative Leader

Cady's journey in Mean Girls – from naive outsider to manipulative insider to authentic leader – mirrors the transformation that many healthcare professionals need to make to create truly collaborative teams. The key insight is that you can't fight dysfunction with more dysfunction, and you can't create authentic collaboration through manipulation or force.

The first step is recognizing the cliques and dynamics that exist in your own practice. This requires honest assessment of how different team members interact, where communication breaks down, and what unspoken rules govern behavior. Just like Cady had to understand the social hierarchy before she could change it, healthcare leaders need to understand their team dynamics before they can improve them.

The second step is refusing to participate in the dysfunction, even when it would be easier or more politically advantageous to go along with existing patterns. This might mean having direct conversations instead of communicating through intermediaries, sharing information transparently instead of hoarding it for power, or addressing conflicts directly instead of letting them fester.

The third step is actively working to break down barriers between different groups and create opportunities for authentic collaboration. This isn't about forced team-building exercises or superficial "we're all one big family" messaging – it's about creating systems and processes that require different team members to work together toward shared goals.

The final step is modeling the kind of collaborative behavior you want to see from others. This means being vulnerable about your own limitations, asking for help when you need it, celebrating other people's contributions, and taking responsibility for your role in team dysfunction.

The Lunch Table Revolution: Creating Inclusive Team Culture

The most powerful scene in Mean Girls isn't the dramatic confrontation or the revenge plot – it's the moment when the rigid lunch table hierarchy breaks down and people start sitting with different groups, having real conversations, and discovering they have more in common than they thought. Creating this kind of transformation in healthcare teams requires intentional effort to break down silos and create inclusive collaboration.

Start by examining your current team structure and identifying the invisible barriers that prevent collaboration. These might be physical – different groups working in separate areas with limited interaction. They might be temporal – different shifts or schedules that prevent team members from connecting. They might be informational – some team members having access to information that others need but don't receive.

Create regular opportunities for different team members to work together on shared projects and goals. This might involve cross-functional teams for quality improvement initiatives, shared responsibility for patient outcomes, or collaborative problem-solving sessions when challenges arise. The key is ensuring that these collaborations are meaningful and directly connected to patient care rather than artificial team-building exercises.

Develop communication systems that promote transparency and shared understanding. This might involve regular all-team meetings where everyone hears the same information, shared dashboards that show how different roles contribute to overall outcomes, or structured processes for sharing feedback and ideas across different functions.

Establish shared metrics and goals that require collaboration to achieve. When everyone's success depends on working together effectively, the natural incentives shift from competition and territorialism to collaboration and mutual support. This might involve team-based quality bonuses, shared responsibility for patient satisfaction scores, or collaborative goals for operational efficiency.

The Janis Ian Wisdom: Why Outsiders See Solutions Insiders Miss

Janis Ian's role as the outsider observer gives her unique insights into the dysfunction that insiders can't see or won't acknowledge. In healthcare teams, the "Janis Ian perspective" often comes from newer team members, part-time staff, or people who work across multiple practices and can see patterns that insiders miss.

These outsider perspectives are incredibly valuable for identifying dysfunction and potential solutions, but they're often dismissed or ignored because they come from people who aren't part of the established hierarchy. Creating space for these voices requires intentional effort to seek out different perspectives and create safe channels for feedback and suggestions.

New employees often see inefficiencies and communication breakdowns that established team members have learned to work around or ignore. Instead of just training them to adapt to existing dysfunction, use their fresh perspective to identify improvement opportunities.

Part-time or temporary staff often work with multiple practices and can provide insights into different approaches and best practices. Create opportunities to learn from their comparative experience rather than just expecting them to adapt to your existing systems.

Patients and their families are the ultimate outsiders who experience the impact of team dysfunction directly. Their feedback about communication gaps, coordination failures, and service inconsistencies provides valuable insights into how team dynamics affect care quality.

External consultants, auditors, or reviewers can provide objective assessments of team function and identify patterns that insiders can't see. While their feedback might be uncomfortable, it often reveals important opportunities for improvement.

The Spring Fling Solution: Celebrating Collaborative Success

The Spring Fling scene in Mean Girls represents the transformation from a toxic, competitive environment to one where people can be authentic, celebrate each other's success, and work together toward shared goals. Creating this kind of positive team culture in healthcare requires intentional celebration of collaborative behaviors and shared achievements.

Recognize and reward collaborative behaviors just as much as individual achievements. When team members go out of their way to help each other, share information effectively, or work together to solve problems, make sure those behaviors are acknowledged and celebrated.

Create opportunities for team members to recognize each other's contributions. This might involve peer nomination systems for recognition programs, regular sharing of success stories that highlight collaboration, or structured opportunities for team members to express appreciation for each other's work.

Celebrate shared achievements that required collaboration to accomplish. When quality measures improve, patient satisfaction increases, or operational efficiency gains are achieved through team effort, make sure the celebration emphasizes the collaborative nature of the success.

Share stories about how collaboration directly benefits patients and their families. When team members can see the concrete impact of their collaborative efforts on patient outcomes, it reinforces the value of working together and motivates continued cooperation.

The Mathlete Victory: Why Smart Teams Beat Individual Stars

One of the most satisfying moments in Mean Girls is when the Mathletes – the supposedly "uncool" academic team – achieve success through genuine collaboration and shared expertise. This scene illustrates an important truth about high-performing teams: collective intelligence and collaborative problem-solving often outperform individual brilliance.

In healthcare, the "Mathlete principle" means that teams with strong collaboration skills and effective communication often achieve better patient outcomes than teams with more individual talent but poor teamwork. The most skilled physician in the world can't provide excellent care if their team doesn't communicate effectively, coordinate care appropriately, or work together to address patient needs.

Building a "Mathlete team" in healthcare means prioritizing collaboration skills alongside clinical expertise. This involves hiring for teamwork abilities, training team members in communication and collaboration techniques, and creating systems that reward collective success rather than just individual performance.

It also means recognizing that every team member brings unique expertise and perspective that contributes to overall success. The front desk staff member who notices a patient's subtle change in behavior, the nurse who identifies a potential medication interaction, or the care coordinator who recognizes a pattern in patient no-shows – these insights are just as valuable as clinical diagnoses when it comes to providing comprehensive patient care.

The Authentic Leadership Lesson: Being Real in a Fake Environment

Cady's final transformation involves learning to be authentic in an environment that rewards fakeness and manipulation. For healthcare leaders, this means creating genuine collaboration in systems that often incentivize competition, territorialism, and self-protection.

Authentic leadership in healthcare teams means being honest about challenges and limitations rather than pretending everything is fine when it's not. It means admitting when you don't know something and asking for help from team members who have relevant expertise.

It means having difficult conversations directly and respectfully rather than avoiding conflict or communicating through intermediaries. When team members aren't performing effectively, when processes aren't working, or when interpersonal conflicts are affecting patient care, authentic leaders address these issues head-on.

It means sharing credit generously and taking responsibility for failures without throwing team members under the bus. When things go well, authentic leaders highlight the contributions of team members who made success possible. When things go poorly, they focus on system improvements rather than individual blame.

Most importantly, it means consistently modeling the collaborative behaviors you want to see from others, even when it's difficult or when existing systems reward different approaches.

The Fetch Revolution: Making Collaboration the New Cool

Regina's attempt to make "fetch" happen represents the futility of trying to force cultural change through manipulation or decree. Real cultural change – like making collaboration "cool" in healthcare teams – requires authentic commitment, consistent modeling, and systems that support the desired behaviors.

Making collaboration the new cool in healthcare means celebrating team achievements more than individual accomplishments, sharing success stories that highlight effective teamwork, and creating opportunities for team members to develop and demonstrate collaborative skills.

It means designing workflows and processes that require collaboration to be successful, rather than systems that allow or encourage people to work in isolation. When collaboration is necessary for achieving goals, it becomes a natural part of team culture rather than an add-on expectation.

It means hiring and promoting people who demonstrate strong collaboration skills, and providing development opportunities for team members who want to improve their teamwork abilities. When collaborative behavior is clearly valued and rewarded, it becomes the norm rather than the exception.

The North Shore Transformation: Your Team's Happy Ending

The end of Mean Girls shows North Shore High School transformed from a toxic, clique-ridden environment to one where people can be authentic, support each other, and work together effectively. Your healthcare team can achieve the same kind of transformation, but it requires commitment, patience, and consistent effort from everyone involved.

Start by honestly assessing your current team dynamics and identifying the cliques, barriers, and dysfunction that prevent effective collaboration. Be willing to acknowledge your own role in perpetuating these patterns and commit to changing your behavior.

Create opportunities for different team members to work together on meaningful projects that directly impact patient care. Make sure these collaborations are structured for success with clear goals, defined roles, and appropriate support.

Develop communication systems that promote transparency, shared understanding, and mutual respect. This might involve regular team meetings, shared information systems, or structured feedback processes.

Establish metrics and incentives that reward collaborative behavior and shared success rather than just individual performance. When team members' success depends on working together effectively, collaboration becomes a natural priority.

Most importantly, be patient with the process. Cultural change takes time, and there will be setbacks and challenges along the way. But when you create an environment where everyone can sit together, contribute their unique strengths, and work toward shared goals, the impact on patient care – and team satisfaction – is transformational.

Ready to break up the healthcare cliques and create a team that actually works together? Your patients – and your team – deserve better than cafeteria politics.

© 2025 The VBC Whisperer. All rights reserved.